<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Allfree &#187; erlang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benallfree.com/tag/erlang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benallfree.com</link>
	<description>Custom programming by someone who knows the difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:14:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Next-Driven Development in Rails</title>
		<link>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/11/01/next-driven-development-in-rails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/11/01/next-driven-development-in-rails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActiveRecord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benallfree.com/index.php/2008/11/01/next-driven-development-in-rails/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TDD says: Do the simplest thing next.
NDD says: Do the thing you need next the simplest way you can.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/11/01/next-driven-development-in-rails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethinking erlang</title>
		<link>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/06/10/rethinking-erlang/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/06/10/rethinking-erlang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benallfree.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[erlang is a programming language that is supposed to be very scalable. It encourages a form of design that is naturally scalable and as such requires some degree of adjustment for many programmers. The whole idea doesn&#8217;t sit well with me. For the technical among you, you probably already know that erlang utilizes a &#8220;shared <a href='http://www.benallfree.com/2008/06/10/rethinking-erlang/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benallfree.com/2008/06/10/rethinking-erlang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

